Dear visitor, welcome to KDE-Forum.org. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "xoseramus" (Apr 23rd 2007, 5:16am)
Quoted
Originally posted by grimweb
I've simply never come across this situation... I just noticed that it is not possible to send HTML mails by default... first time I ever checked it...
Going that kids also use Kmail maybe the feature would be handy...
Still HTML-mail is wrong, but I guess sometimes you have to go with the flow...
btw: why are they so worried about a message they wrote themselves? shouldn't they be more worried about your awnser to it?
Quoted
Originally posted by AVonGauss
For example, what is most recently burning me and frustrating my clients is when they use Outlook to send a message with color highlighting (HTML) and I use KMail to reply, if I don't make use of "HTML" KMail automatically replies with plain text only. In most cases it doesn't preserve any of the HTML formatting of the original message in either replies or forwards unless you forward the message as an attachment.
The client I am referring to is a Fortune 500 company - some of their execs may act like kids or even big babies sometimes, but HTML definitely has business purposes.
Quoted
Originally posted by daihard
I *always* (<-- this is how you can emphasize text instead of "colouring" it) write plain text mail. I also try my best to bottom-post when I reply. That's the way it should be, and I don't want to have the limited resource of KDE engineers work on improving HTML support. They've got better things to do.
Quoted
Originally posted by jms
Please consider the following usual situation.
You are discussing about a one page specification via mail.
The spec is formatted in html by the other members of your group (You are lucky enough that this spec is not formatted in a Word document).
Each time a member propose a small correction to the spec he use a specific color to insert inline comments in the spec (Larger comments are usually top or bottom posted referring to the inline comments).
[snip]
Imho this is the *biggest* problem kde is facing in business environment. Big enough to give up (or being forced to stop) using kde or even linux.
I can't believe that the kde team consider this minor. Unless using kde in business environment is considered "not important" or even incongruous.
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "daihard" (May 24th 2007, 9:17am)
Quoted
Originally posted by daihard
I suppose it depends upon the business environment you are in. For instance, many of our customers choose to send us plain text e-mail. The KDE team must allocate their resources wisely. If they believe the way you guys use e-mail isn't a very common practice, chances are they do consider it a minor issue, and rightfully so.
Quoted
Originally posted by jms
Probably, being alone using linux/kde in a company where 6000 other employees use Windows/Outlook is uncommon and it certainly will remain so until kmail better integrates with Outlook.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "petersjm" (Jun 12th 2007, 10:46pm)
Quoted
I personally dislike HTML mail because (1) it adds unnecessary complexity (in the name of beautiful decoration) to e-mail messages, and (2) it makes proper commenting (i.e. bottom-posting) very hard. The current HTML support built into Kmail is as much as I'd like to see in it.
I *always* (<-- this is how you can emphasize text instead of "colouring" it) write plain text mail. I also try my best to bottom-post when I reply. That's the way it should be, and I don't want to have the limited resource of KDE engineers work on improving HTML support. They've got better things to do.
Quoted
Originally posted by vdicarlo
I have been using Kmail for a few years now, and like it a lot, but the thing that's got me thinking about switching to something else is that there's no good way to move my mail folders (including the subfolder structure) from one installation of KDE to another, as when one changes computers.
+1, AgreedQuoted
OK, let's be realistic. This objection to anything except plain text emails is really only elitist, inverted snobbery. Sorry to be so brutal - but information presentation is very important in all fields. Early typographers would be astonished by someone claiming to prefer plain text. How well information is presented is a major factor in how it is understood.
Please, please let us move on and allow KMail to realise its potential.
I sort of agree only instead of doing it the way you suggest, id link it to kopete. AFAIK, kde4.1 will provide the support for much closer integration. I was supposed to be working and i came up with a really good design for this, unfortunatly it seams Kmails problem is lack of developers not ideas. I will post up my idea anyway because it may helpmore and more Groupware Server integrate Messenger Service
integrate a Messenger Client into KMail
Forum Software: Burning Board®, developed by WoltLab® GmbH
Linux Computer - Linux Forum -
Linux Computer und Notebooks - Lastminute - Wasserbetten & Whirlpools